1. Home
  2. Projects
  3. Arystanovskoye
Case study / Undisclosed operator · Western Kazakhstan

Real-time zonal inflow monitoring with PROBE™ in dual-zone ESP wells

55 / 45Measured zonal split, adopted for official production accounting

PROBE™ instrument with its turbine flowmeter in a protective cage, lying on the pipe rack at the wellsite
PROBE™ instrument — turbine flowmeter in its protective cage · Arystanovskoye

Task

Arystanovskoye, in Western Kazakhstan, is a mature field producing from stacked Jurassic horizons; its dual-zone oil wells commingle two formations and lift them with ESPs. Zonal surveillance relied on PLT surveys run past the pump through a Y-tool — each one a well shut-in, a logging crew and a high cost per run, and each only a snapshot. Between surveys the operator could not see how production was split between the formations, nor the water cut and pressure of each: allocation rested on an expected split of about 70/30 in favour of the upper horizon.

The operator needed continuous, real-time zonal inflow data — without well shut-ins and without recurring logging runs.

Solution

AB Smart Services integrated the PROBE Multilayer system into the ESP completions of four dual-zone wells: two instruments per well, one directly above each producing formation, eight in all. The system goes in during an ESP workover with the standard program unchanged — no Y-tool, no bypass tubing, no additional cable to surface.

On well A-228, documented in SPE-236181-MS, the two instruments hang on a single armoured cable from the bottom of the standard ESP downhole gauge. The upper one, 14 m below the gauge and above horizon J-X, measures the flow of both horizons; the lower one, 32 m further down between the horizons, measures horizon J-XI alone, and the difference gives J-X. Each measures flow rate with a turbine, water cut over 0–100%, pressure and temperature. The gauge relays their data through the ESP power cable to the control panel, where they appear next to the ESP parameters every 10 seconds.

  • Vendor-neutral: connects at the standard downhole-gauge interface of all major ESP suppliers
  • Four-hour sensor-string hookup within the normal run-in-hole, function-tested every 500 m on the way down
  • No added cable, control line, wellhead penetration or surface infrastructure

Result

Both instruments on A-228 streamed zonal data from start-up, with no shut-in and no logging run. In the first weeks, while the total rate settled from about 9.4 to a stable 11–11.7 m³/d, the split between the horizons visibly shifted as each layer cleaned up — a change that commingled surface data and snapshot logging would have missed.

  • Measured split over the stable period, 23 July – 3 August 2024: 55% upper (J-X), 45% lower (J-XI), ±4 percentage points — not the ~70/30 expected before installation
  • The operator adopted the measured split for official production accounting and regulatory reporting
  • The downhole total of 12.7 m³/d agreed with a separator test (11.9 m³/d) and tank measurement (12.1 m³/d) within instrument accuracy
  • Water cut showed the lower zone first producing kill fluid while the upper zone produced oil from start-up
  • ESP operating modes optimised against each zone’s response; any change in the well is traced to its interval as it happens
  • Y-tool PLT campaigns eliminated — more than 12 surveys over the pump run, with their shut-ins, crews and personnel exposure
  • The two-instrument assembly costs about as much as one conventional PLT survey, so the first avoided survey pays it back
Well A-228: PROBE instrument layoutDepth schematic, 2925–3005 m: bottom of the ESP with its downhole gauge at 2930 m; upper PROBE instrument at 2946–2947 m above horizon J-X (perforated 2953–2959 m); lower instrument at 2977–2978 m between the horizons; horizon J-XI perforated 2987–2999.5 m.Depth, m2930295029702990ESP and downhole gauge2930 mUpper PROBE instrument2946–2947 mHorizon J-X2953–2959 mLower PROBE instrument2977–2978 mHorizon J-XI2987–2999.5 mProduction split between the horizonsAssumed before installation: about 70% from the upper horizon and 30% from the lower. Measured 23 July – 3 August 2024: 55% and 45%, ±4 percentage points. Total liquid rate: 12.7 m³/d downhole, 11.9 by separator test, 12.1 by tank.Assumed before installation~70%~30%Measured 23 Jul – 3 Aug 202455%45%±4 ppUpper horizon J-XLower horizon J-XITotal liquid rate, m³/dPROBE, downhole12.7Separator test11.9Tank12.1
Well A-228: an instrument above each horizon (left); the zonal split and the rate check (right)
Case studies

Other projects

All projects

A similar challenge?

Describe the well, manifold or field and we will propose a scope.

Contact us